Law Office of Williams & Associates, P.C.
  • Sacramento: (916) 488-8501
  • Toll Free: (800) 684-7147

Supreme Court Archives

U.S. Supreme Court Declines FATCA Case - What This Means to Individuals with Offshore Accounts

What do a U.S. Senator, the owner of an Albanian brokerage firm, an attorney who is a dual citizen of America and Israel, and a group of current and former U.S. citizen now living in Canada, Switzerland, and the Czech Republic all have in common? They have been denied review by the U.S. Supreme Court in their jointly failed attempt to enjoin the enforcement of the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA), certain intergovernmental agreements (IGAs), and the foreign bank account reporting (FBAR) penalty.

Sales Taxes have Caught Up with the Times

In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled today that states may now require online retailers to collect sales taxes from consumers, regardless of where the business is located or the product is delivered. In 1992, the same court ruled that a business had to have some kind of "physical presence" or "nexus" in order to be required to collect sales tax in a state. With the increased use of online shopping, however, it turns out not all taxpayers report non-taxed purchases to the states in which they reside. In fact, an estimated $33.9 billion goes uncollected in sales taxes each year, costing states a significant sum. Additionally, internet shopping tax-free has hurt the brick-and-mortar stores that already have higher operational costs due to a physical presence in a state, since they must collect sales tax on taxable transactions.

Worker Classification to be Tested in California Supreme Court

In January, 2015, the California Supreme Court granted review of Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court (Lee) (2014) 230 Cal.App.4th 718.

Supreme Court rules on standards for evidentiary hearings in summons enforcement proceedings

Yesterday the Supreme Court issued an opinion in which it set forth standards for obtaining an evidentiary hearing in the context of a summons enforcement proceeding. Clarke v. U.S., No. 13-301 (June 19, 2014).

Supreme Court won't hear Amazon and Overstock

On Monday, December 2, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear a case that could have answered long-standing questions about a state's right to collect sales tax from internet retailers who do not have a physical presence in the state. Amazon and Overstock.com joined forces to challenge a New York state law that requires online retailers to collect the sales tax. The lawsuit claims the New York law is not constitutional because it violates the Commerce Clause, which limits the states' power to regulate interstate commerce.

Supreme Court Upholds Valuation Misstatement Penalty for Disallowed Partnership Losses

Yesterday the Supreme Court held that the 40% gross valuation misstatement penalty under I.R.C. § 6662(h) is applicable in cases where the IRS determines that a partnership is a sham or lacks economic substance. United States v. Woods, No. 12-562 (U.S. Dec. 3, 2013). The Court's opinion in Woods provides two main holdings: (1) that the District Court had jurisdiction under TEFRA to determine whether the partnerships' lack of economic substance could justify the application of a valuation misstatement penalty on the partners; and (2) that the gross valuation misstatement penalty applied to the disallowed partnership losses.

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on Foreign Tax Credit Dispute

I've recently blogged about the plethora of multi-jurisdictional tax issues which continue to increase as business becomes ever more globalized. On February 20th, the U.S. Supreme Court yesterday heard oral argument in PPL Corp. v. Commissioner. In PPL, the Court is considering:

BNA Article Argues that Quill Safe Harbor Extends to Sales of Intangibles Through the Internet.

The Bureau of National Affairs (BNA) has published an article which argues that the activities involved in selling intangible goods, such as songs and digital books, by means of the Internet are not sufficiently connected to states so as to permit states to tax them. The article confines its analysis to an explication of Commerce Clause "nexus," but it also asserts along the way that the selling of intangibles on the Internet may also be protected from taxation by the Due Process Clause.

U.S. Supreme Court Declines To Review Connecticut's Taxation of Out-of-State Seller

On October 9, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court denied, without comment, Scholastic Book Club's petition for certiorari, declining to hear an appeal regarding Connecticut's taxation of classroom catalog sales of books to students.

Contact Us Today

Law Office of Williams & Associates, PC
3600 American River Drive, Suite 135
Sacramento, CA 95864


Toll Free: ( 800) 684-7147
Phone: ( 916) 488-8501
Fax: ( 916) 488-8196 | E-mail Us
Map & Directions