The California Franchise Tax Board announced that with the 0.5 percent increase in inflation over the last fiscal year, adjustments have also been made to income tax brackets, filing requirement thresholds, the standard deduction and certain credits for tax year 2014.
In her mid-year report, the Taxpayer Advocate identified top priorities as issuing refunds to victims of return preparer fraud, continuing to make improvements in the Exempt Organizations area and expanding the recently announced voluntary return preparer certification program to include competency testing.
Many people enjoy hobbies and even earn money as a result. That income is reportable and business related to the income may be deductible so long as the activity is not truly a hobby. The way the activity is treated is important in determining whether the government will recognize the activity as a business. The IRS will analyze whether the activity is conducted in a businesslike manner, whether the taxpayer intends to make a profit, the amount of profit, current employment, efforts to increase profit and the causes of losses, along with other criteria.
Recently the District Court for the Western District of Kentucky upheld the imposition of a penalty under I.R.C. sec. 6656(a), which provides a penalty in the case of any failure to deposit a tax payment on the due date unless that failure is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Commonwealth Bank and Trust Company v. United States, Civ. No. 3:13-CV-01204-CRS (July 3, 2014). At first glance, the ruling may seem peculiar in that it upholds the imposition of a failure-to-deposit penalty even though the taxpayer made full, timely payments to the IRS. However, the Treasury Regulations require that taxpayers who deposit more than $200,000 in taxes must use electronic funds transfer (EFT) to make deposits of these taxes. Treas. Reg. sec. 31.6302-1(h)(2)(ii).
The IRS has revised its plan to revoke Individual Tax Identification Numbers (ITINs) after five years of issuance based on the response from taxpayers and their representatives. Instead, beginning in 2016, the IRS will only retire those ITINs which have not been used on a federal income tax return for five consecutive years. For more information, read the IRS Press Release.
The IRS has created a new form to help small charitable organizations obtain 501(c)(3) tax-status. Instead of filing the 26-page Form 102, qualified organizations may use the IRS' new form, 1023-EZ, to complete the application. An estimated 70 percent of organizations seeking tax-exempt status will qualify for the streamlined approach, if gross receipts are $50,000 or less and assets do not exceed $250,000. For more information, read the IRS Press Release.
Six years ago, the FTB endeavored to implement a tax system modernization project, Enterprise Data to Revenue(EDR),to update existing systems that would allow the FTB to use data more efficiently and automate manual processes. The project has already doubled its projected revenue and is 10 months ahead of schedule.
Yesterday the Supreme Court issued an opinion in which it set forth standards for obtaining an evidentiary hearing in the context of a summons enforcement proceeding. Clarke v. U.S., No. 13-301 (June 19, 2014).
The threshold for the government to obtain summons enforcement in a U.S. district court is fairly low. In general, the government simply needs to meet the Powell factors: (1) that the investigation will be conducted pursuant to a legitimate purpose; (2) that the inquiry may be relevant to the purpose; (3) that the information sought is not already within the government's possession; and (4) that the administrative steps required by the Internal Revenue Code have been followed. U.S. v. Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964).
On Friday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Tax Court's decision to disallow a capital loss deduction on the ground that the underlying transaction lacked economic substance and was designed to create substantial capital losses. Reddam v. Commissioner, No. 12-72135 (9th Cir. Jun. 13, 2014).
The case involved the founder of DiTech, a home mortgage company that was sold to GMAC Mortgage. That sale generated $48,500,000 in capital gains, and the taxpayer entered into the Offshore Portfolio Investment Strategy ("OPIS") transaction marketed by KPMG in an attempt to offset those gains. On his 1999 tax return, the taxpayer claimed an offsetting loss of $50,200,000 related to the OPIS transaction, which involved a series of structured transactions designed to generate a large tax loss.
A federal jury found that Carl Zwerner must pay more than $2 million for wilfully failing to file Reports of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBARs). In this case, the IRS sought a 50 percent penalty for each of the four years at issue, for a total of 200 percent in a civil case. Clearly, the punishment for not coming forward and reporting offshore accounts is pricey. In this case, the highest value of the account over the four years was approximately $1.55 million, but the total penalties for failing to file this report, which carries no tax, were approximately $2.24 million.